He's the best I can think of!

I believe he really does.

James has repeatedly proven himself to be driven, level-headed, able to work hard, a good leader and a fine diplomat. He has experience working in highsec space and extensive knowledge of the mining industry. He has been able to create an organisation in highsec space spanning several systems. James engages with the forum community and updates his blog on a regular basis. He really does tick all the boxes when it comes to a possible highsec CSM candidate.

"Be not afraid of greatness: some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them."
William Shakespeare, Twelfth Night.

I am humbled by this spontaneous outpouring of grassroots support.

How will you stop the dastardly 0.0ers from using their multiplicity of hi-sec alts to bloc vote the candidates of their choice into the hi-sec positions?

On behalf of the 0.0 nullbear ganktard community, I applaud your proposal to raise still higher the threshold to CSM voting, and furthermore I undertake to absolutely promise that none of us will lie like syphilitic weasels in order to procure the result we want.


~pinky-swear~

That kind of wisdom doesnGÇÖt come from above. It belongs to this world. It is self-centered and demonic.

"Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something." - Plato

Seriously +1 vote for James for High Sec rep. Maybe then we will shake the automatic assumption that High Sec player = Best representation for what High Sec players want.

Actually the quote was aimed at your post that was just a quote with no content

Point is that if someone wants to argue that the CSM is ignoring High Sec player needs fine. I will disagree but your opinion is your opinion and you may feel High Sec needs more/something different. That is something I can disagree with but ultimately respect.

Arguing that there NEEDS to be a High Sec rep, or arguing that there should be some easier way for a High Sec rep to be elected is daft in the extreme for many reasons, one of them being that you might get someone like James315 who is more radical and care less about High Sec players then 99% of the people in null. That is an opinion I don't respect, because it is completely illogical.

For where you have envy and selfish ambition, there you find disorder and every evil practice.

The threads turned into ranting as peoples' reaction to James' revolutionary ideas. Some may say hisec is unready for James 315, but I say that all of hisec needs him ASAP.

Lots of people dislike Mittens or any other CSM member, but that doesn't mean he was poor at his job. It's a polarizing situation to be in.

Bump for james - if you will pardon the pun.

I think at this point you've pretty much ceded the entire debate to James 315.

You're really not one to talk. Your posts are the stupidest ones I've read on this forum, even counting Frying Doom. It's amazing how many jokes in this thread have gone flying over your head, as indicated by your clueless, spergy responses. You would make a better case for your position by not posting at all, but since your position is terrible and I want you to continue to make it look bad, please continue.

Together we can make EVE-O a better place to post.

Hahhahaha, nice try. You are lost in Eve. Lost, lost, lost, lost. It's all about the posting. What do you lack? The posting. Your posting, it lacks. It lacks because you are a bad poster. You are a bad poster because your posting is bad. But you will never understand. You are doomed to live out your tragic role.

James 315 is a knowledgeable, well-written veteran with tons of applicable experience that would be valuable as a sounding board for CCP's ideas, so I understand why people are slow to recognize him as a highsec player and poster